Pay For Essay Writing Service -
Download (5Mb) - UM Students Repository
Nov 11, 2017 Jenayah bukan indeks, high quality custom essay writing service -
Esei Pengajian Am: Jenayah Bukan Indeks | eseipa comIt is a long list. People have a lot of problems. Some of the items sound picky or trivial, even to me. Yet bad grammar, bad style, and poor organization will make it very difficult for you to convey your ideas clearly and professionally, and will limit your academic and jenayah professional success. I strongly recommend that you work to eliminate any of these problems that may apply to your own writing. -- Dr. James A. Bednar. Rules for formal writing are quite strict, though often unstated. Formal writing is used in academic and scientific settings whenever you want to convey your ideas to a wide audience, with many possible backgrounds and assumptions. Unlike casual conversation or emails to friends, formal writing needs to be clear, unambiguous, literal, and well structured. Formal writing is not just dictated conversation In general, it is is immoral don marquis, inappropriate simply to write as you would speak. Bukan Indeks! In conversation, the its learning, listener can ask for bukan indeks clarification or elaboration easily, and thus the speaker can use imprecise language, ramble from topic to topic freely, and theory so on. Jenayah Bukan Indeks! Formal writing must instead stand on its own, conveying the consequentialism, author's thesis clearly through words alone. Jenayah Indeks! As a result, formal writing requires substantial effort to construct meaningful sentences, paragraphs, and arguments relevant to a well-defined thesis. Why Abortion! The best formal writing will be difficult to write but very easy to read. The author's time and jenayah bukan effort spent on writing will be repaid with the time and effort saved by the (many) readers. Make your thesis obvious throughout An essay, article, or report should have one main topic (the "thesis") that is clearly evident in the introduction and conclusion. Of course, the thesis may itself be a conjunction or a contrast between two items, but it must still be expressible as a single, coherent point. Set It Off Film! In a short essay, the main point should usually conclude the introductory paragraph. In a longer essay, the main point generally concludes the jenayah bukan, introductory section. Disorder! The reader should never be in any doubt about what your thesis is; whenever you think it might not be absolutely obvious, remind the reader again. When in jenayah doubt, use the theory, recipe: introduce, expand/justify, conclude Paragraphs, subsections, sections, chapters, and books all use the same structure: first make the jenayah bukan indeks, topic clear, then expand upon it, and finally sum up, tying everything back to the topic. At each level, you need to tell the reader what you will be trying to say (in this paragraph, section, etc.), then you need to cover all the Essay about Borderline, relevant material, clearly relating it to jenayah your stated point, and finally you need to tie the subtopics together so that they do indeed add up to establish the point that you promised. Stay on topic Everything in your document should be related clearly to Essay Personality Disorder your main thesis. You can write other papers later for anything else you might want to say. The reason your reader is reading this particular paper of yours is jenayah, that he or she wants to know about your main topic, not simply about everything you might want to say (unless for some narcissistic reason "everything you might want to say" is your clearly stated main topic). Conversely, there is no need to bring up items simply because they relate to your main topic, if you do not have anything to say about set it off film, them. If you do bring something up, say something important about jenayah indeks, it! Staying on topic does not mean being one sided To avoid being misleading, you will often need to acknowledge some weaknesses in your argument or discuss some merits of an opposing argument. It is quite appropriate to discuss such opposing views when they are relevant, i.e., when they relate directly to the main topic of your paper. For instance, if you are reviewing a paper and consequentialism theory arguing that it was not written well overall, it is usually a good idea to point out the few things that were done well, e.g. so that the reader does not get the impression that you just like to complain :-) . Often such opposing observations fit well just after the introduction, providing a background for the rest of your arguments that follow. Whenever you do include such material, i.e. Bukan Indeks! things that go in consequentialism the direction opposite to your main thesis, be careful to put it into jenayah indeks only a few well-defined places, reorganizing your argument to achieve that when necessary. Jumping back and forth will confuse the reader unnecessarily. In every case, try to make your point as clearly as possible, while at the same time not overstating it and not pretending that no other valid viewpoints exist. Transitions are difficult but very important Each sentence in your document should follow smoothly from the preceding sentence, and each paragraph should follow smoothly from the preceding paragraph. The world is arguably an consequentialism theory, unstructured jumble of bukan, ideas, but anything that you expect the consequentialism theory, reader to jenayah read from start to finish needs to be a linear progression along one single path. Transition words and phrases are what make it possible for a reader to follow you easily as you explore the various ideas in your paper. Without good transitions, the reader will end up backtracking repeatedly, which will often cause your point to be lost or your paper to be tossed aside altogether. One clue that your writing needs better transitions is if you find that you can cut and Essay Borderline Personality Disorder paste paragraphs from bukan one section to another without doing substantial rewriting of why abortion don marquis, how the paragraph begins and ends. If making such rearrangements is easy, then you have not been linking your paragraphs into a coherent narrative that reads well from indeks start to about Personality Disorder finish. In practice, making smooth transitions is very difficult. Learning to do it takes a lot of practice at first, and actually making the transitions smooth takes a lot of indeks, effort every time you write or revise something. One rule of thumb is that whenever you switch topics, you should try to provide a verbal clue that you are doing so, using transitions like "However, . ", "As a result, . ", "For comparison, ", etc. If you notice that you have to add these words between most of your sentences, not just the paragraphs, then you are bouncing around too much. In that case you need to reorganize your document to group related thoughts together, switching topics only when necessary. Once the organization is good, all you can do is read and reread what you write, rewording it until each new item follows easily from those before it. Write what you mean, mean what you write Speakers use many informal, colloquial phrases in Essay Borderline Personality casual conversation, usually intending to convey meanings other than what the jenayah bukan indeks, words literally indicate. For instance, we often speak informally of Good in Wuthering, "going the extra mile", "at the end of the bukan indeks, day", "hard facts", things being "crystal clear" or "pretty" convincing, someone "sticking to" a topic, readers being "turned off", something "really" being the case, etc. Avoid such imprecise writing in formal prose -- whenever possible, the words you write should literally mean exactly what they say. If there were no miles involved, do not write of extra ones; if there was no crystal, do not write about its clarity. Among other benefits, avoiding such informal language will ensure that your meaning is obvious even to set it off film those who have not learned the currently popular idioms, such as those for jenayah indeks whom English is a second language and those who might read your writing years from now or in another part of the world. Formal writing should be clear to as many people as possible, and its meaning should not depend on vs. Evil in Wuthering Essay, the whims of your local dialect of jenayah, English. Why Abortion Is Immoral! It is a permanent and public record of your ideas, and should mean precisely what you have written. Avoid redundancy Unfortunately, specifying minimum page requirements encourages redundancy, but please try to avoid that temptation. Jenayah! When two words will do, there is accross its learning, no need to use twenty. Whenever you finish a sentence or paragraph, read over it to see if any words or sentences can be eliminated -- often your point will get much stronger when you do so. In the academic community, your ability to jenayah write concisely is far more important than your ability to fill up a page with text. Academic courses specify page minimums to ensure that you write an essay of the appropriate depth, not to test whether you can say the same thing a dozen different ways just to fill up space. In the Good vs. Evil in Wuthering, real world, you will see many more page maximum specifications than page minimums. Be professional and jenayah diplomatic When writing about another's work, always write as if your subject may read your document. Your essays for a course assignment will probably not be published, but genuine scientific writing will be, and the subject of your paper may very well come across your work eventually. Taroc Pack! Thus it is jenayah bukan, crucial to avoid pejorative, insulting, and offensive terms like "attempt to", "a waste of time", "pointless", etc. If some of the essays I have seen were read out set it off film, loud to bukan the author under discussion, a fistfight would probably result. At the accross, very least, you would have made an enemy for life, which is rarely a good idea. In any case, your points will be much more convincing if you can disagree professionally and diplomatically, without attacking the author or implying that he or she is an imbecile. And, finally, no one will publish your work if it is just a diatribe and not a sober, reasoned argument. To avoid these sorts of problems, it might be good to pretend that you are the author under discussion and re-read your essay through his or her eyes. It should be straightforward to figure out which parts would make you defensive or angry, and jenayah indeks you can then reword those. Avoid imperative voice Use imperative voice sparingly in accross a scientific paper, because it comes across as rude (as do many of the bukan, sentences in what you are reading right now!). About! E.g. do not say "Recall that . ". Of course, an occasional imperative in parentheses is not objectionable (e.g. "(see Walker 1996 for bukan indeks more details)."). A formal document needs to be structured at all levels, whether or not the structure is accross its learning, made explicit using section labels or other visible clues. Overall structure The standard format for an effective essay or article is to: (1) present a coherent thesis in the introduction, (2) try your hardest to convince the reader of your thesis in the body of the jenayah indeks, paper, and (3) restate the thesis in set it off film the conclusion so that the reader remains quite sure what your thesis is, and so that the reader can decide whether he or she was convinced. Using any other format for bukan indeks a formal article is almost invariably a bad idea. The introduction and Essay about conclusions do not always need to jenayah be labeled as such, but they need to be there. Note that an consequentialism, abstract is jenayah bukan, no substitute for an introduction; abstracts act as an independent miniature version of the article, not part of the introduction. Each paragraph is accross its learning, one relevant sub-topic Each paragraph in a document should have one topic that is jenayah indeks, clearly evident early in the paragraph. Every paragraph should have a clear relationship to the main topic of your document; if not, either the paragraph should be eliminated, or the main topic should be revised. Use complete sentences Except in extraordinary circumstances, sentences in the main text must be complete, i.e., they must have a subject and a verb, so that they express an entire thought, not just a fragment or the beginning of a thought. Note that most "-ing" words are not verbs. "The light turning green" is theory, just a fragment, i.e., a start to a sentence or a part of one. To be a sentence that you could use on its own followed by a period, it would have to be "The light turned green", which has both a subject and a verb. Put appropriate punctuation between sentences. Two complete sentences can be divided with a period, question mark, or exclamation point, or they can be weakly connected as clauses with a semicolon. However, they can never be connected with a comma in formal writing! To see if your writing has this problem, consider each of your commas in turn. Indeks! If you could replace the comma with a period, leaving two complete, meaningful sentences, then that comma is an error -- a comma can never be used like that! Instead, replace the comma with a semicolon, in case you have two sentences that need to be linked in some generic way, or make the linkage explicit with a conjunction, or simply use a period, to leave two complete and independent sentences. Section titles Section titles for an article should say exactly and succinctly what the reader will get out of that section. In most relatively short documents, using a standard set of section titles is best so that people can scan through your document quickly. Section standards vary in different fields, but a common set is: Introduction, Background, Methods (for an experimental paper) or Architecture (for a modeling paper), Discussion, Future Work (often merged with Discussion), and Good in Wuthering Heights Essay Conclusion. If you do not use the standard titles, e.g. Bukan Indeks! if you have labeled lower-level subsections, you should be quite explicit about what is in that section. Set It Off Film! Such labels should make sense to someone who has not yet read that section, and make it clear why they should read it. For instance, a section about adding a second eye to a simulation of single-eye vision could truthfully be called "Multiple eyes", but that title is meaningless to someone scanning the document. Instead, it should be something like "Extending the jenayah bukan, model to explain stereo vision" whose meaning will be clear to the type of person likely to be reading the paper. Everything important goes in your introduction and conclusion Everyone who looks at your paper will at least skim the Essay, introduction and conclusion, and those who read it in depth will remember those two sections the best. So make sure that your most important points are quite prominent and unmissable in those sections. Say it, never just say that you will say it In the introduction, conclusion, and abstract (if any), do not merely describe what you are going to bukan say or have said; actually say it! For instance, do not just state that "I will discuss and evaluate this paper" if you will later argue that (for example) it is Heights, not convincing. Instead state that the jenayah indeks, paper is Personality Disorder, unconvincing, and (in brief) why you believe that to be the case. Jenayah Bukan! Then you can elaborate on consequentialism theory, that point in subsequent paragraphs. Subsections If you have sections 1, 1.1, and 1.2, there must be introductory material between 1 and 1.1 that explains briefly what is in the subsections, mentioned in the order of the subsections. Jenayah Bukan! That is, 1.1 should never follow just after 1 without some intervening text. If you have 1.1, there must always be a 1.2; otherwise 1 and 1.1 should be merged. Each 1.x subsection should end with a concluding statement of what has been established in that subsection, wrapping things up before moving on its learning, to the next subsection. Figure captions Different communities have different expectations on jenayah indeks, what to put into set it off film figure captions. Jenayah! Some journals, like Science , have very long captions, which are meant to be readable independently of the main article. That way, readers can skim articles and only look at interesting figures, before deciding whether to read the taroc pack, whole article. Bukan! In such cases, you must ensure that all of the main points of the theory, figure are also mentioned in jenayah indeks the text of the article, so that someone reading the article straight through will not miss them. Other journals and other publications like books, theses, and proposals tend to have very little in the caption, with the figures being understandable only about Borderline Personality when reading the jenayah indeks, main text. Even in such cases, I myself prefer to put all the graphical details like "the dotted line represents" in the caption, plus enough context so that the import of the figure is clear. You are welcome to have your own preferences, but you should be aware of vs. Evil Heights Essay, what you are trying to achieve, i.e. whether you want the jenayah indeks, caption to be readable on set it off film, its own. Try hard to bukan indeks avoid ambiguous references Conversation is replete with ambiguous words like "this", "these", "his", "it", "they", etc. These words have no meaning in themselves, but in conversation the meaning is usually clear from the context. In written text, however, the intended meaning is quite often not evident to accross its learning the reader, because there are e.g. many possible interpretations of "it" and "this". It is a good idea to indeks read over anything you write, searching for this sort of word. For each instance, first ask yourself "To what specific item does this term refer?". For such a reference to make sense, the object, person, or concept must have been explicitly mentioned just prior to accross its learning your reference. Often you will find that "it" or "they" refers to something vague that was not even discussed explicitly in jenayah bukan your paper, in which case you should reword your text entirely. Even if the item to which you refer is explicitly mentioned in your paper, ask yourself whether there is any chance that the reader might not know to which of several items you might be referring. E.g. for the word "he", were there two or three people being discussed? If so then state the actual name of each; "he" would be ambiguous. Often an accross its learning, ambiguous "this" or "these" can be disambiguated by adding a noun that specifies precisely the type of object or concept to which you are referring. For instance, "this argument" or "this paper" is less confusing than simply "this". That is, do not use "this" followed directly by a verb phrase, but you can use "this" before a noun phrase, as in bukan indeks "this sentence is Essay about Personality, a good example of the jenayah indeks, use of the word 'this'". Watch out for homonyms Spell checkers are wonderful, but they are absolutely useless for theory detecting misused homonyms or near-homonyms, i.e., actual words whose meaning is confused with other actual words. As a result, homonyms are probably the most common spelling errors in word-processed text. Indeks! Even if you are lazy and theory let the spell checker fix all of your other words, make certain that you know the differences between words like: If you do not know the difference, you must simply avoid using any of these words. Yet because the spell checker takes care of all the other words you may misspell, learning to use these few words correctly is bukan, surely not much of a burden, and is crucial for convincing your readers that you are competent and trustworthy. Avoid "comprise" Apparently the word "comprise" has now been used incorrectly so many times to mean "compose" that this usage is now becoming acceptable. But it is is immoral, much safer simply to avoid "comprise" altogether, as anyone who does know what it started out meaning will be annoyed when you use it to mean "compose". "But" and jenayah "however" are not interchangeable The words "but" and "however" have similar meanings, but they are not interchangeable. Set It Off Film! If you take a grammatically correct sentence containing "but" and jenayah bukan indeks replace it with "however", or vice versa, the result will almost always be incorrect, mainly because of comma punctuation. "I like oranges, but I do not like tangerines." "I like oranges. However, I do not like tangerines." "I like oranges; however, I do not like tangerines." "I, however, do not like grapefruits." "I like oranges however they have been prepared." If you exchange any of these "but"s and "however"s, then the sentences would become incorrect, and in consequentialism some cases meaningless. A "point" is a single item The word "point" can only be used for a single, atomic item. Thus it is not appropriate to jenayah discuss a "sub-point", "part of a point", the "first half" of a point, etc. Is Immoral! Instead use "topic" or "section", etc. "A research" There is no noun phrase "a research" in English. Jenayah Indeks! Use "a study" or just "research", never "a research". Is Immoral! Similarly, there is no separate plural form of research; "researches" is an English verb, not a noun. Avoid capitalization When in doubt, use lower case. Capitalization is appropriate only for specific, named, individual items or people. For example, capitalize school subjects only jenayah when you are referring to about Personality a specific course at bukan indeks, a specific school: math is a general subject, but Math 301 is a particular course. Accross! Similarly: Department of Computer Sciences vs. a computer science department, the president vs. Indeks! President Bush. Vs. Evil! When in doubt, use lower case. Avoid contractions Contractions are appropriate only for conversational use and for informal writing, never for technical or formal writing. Hyphenate phrases only when otherwise ambiguous In English phrases (groups of indeks, several words forming a unit), hyphens are used to group pairs of words when the meaning might otherwise be ambiguous. That is, they act like the parentheses in a mathematical expression. They should normally otherwise be avoided unless they are part of a single word (or the dictionary explicitly requires them), i.e., it is a mistake to set it off film use a hyphen where the jenayah bukan, meaning was already clear and taroc pack unambiguous. For instance, long adjective phrases preceding a noun sometimes include another noun temporarily being used as an adjective. Such phrases can often be parsed several different ways with different meanings. Indeks! For example, the phrase "English language learners" as written means "language learners from England", because, by default, "language" modifies "learners", and "English" modifies "language learners". But the don marquis, phrase that was intended was probably "English-language learners", i.e. "learners of the English language", and using the bukan, hyphen helps make that grouping clear. Note that there would never be a hyphen if the same phrase were used after the its learning, noun it modifies, because in that case there would be absolutely no chance of ambiguity: "a learner of the English language" ( NEVER "a learner of the English-language"; the hyphen effectively turns the noun phrase "English language" into an adjective, and a prepositional phrase starting with "of the" must be completed with a noun, not an adjective). Note that hyphens are used only in adjective phrases; they are not needed after an jenayah, adverb (and are therefore incorrect). An adverb explicitly modifies the why abortion is immoral don marquis, adjective immediately following it, never a noun. For instance, a "quickly dropping stock" cannot possibly be mistaken for a "quickly dropping-stock", because adverbs like "quickly" cannot modify a noun phrase like "dropping stock", and so "quickly" clearly must modify "dropping". In general, there should never be a hyphen after an adverb ending in "ly", though hyphens are sometimes necessary after some non-adverbial "ly" words like "early" (as in the correct examples "an early-rising rooster" or "an early-rising English-language learner"). You may want to bukan search through your finished document for "ly-"; nearly all examples of those three characters in a row will be mistakes. In some very complicated phrases, two levels of accross its learning, grouping can be achieved using an bukan, "en" dash, i.e. a slightly longer dash than a hyphen. For instance, a "language-learning--associated problem" would be a problem associated with language learning; the hyphen groups "language" and "learning", while the en-dash "--" connects "language learning" with "associated". Without hyphens or without the en-dash, the phrase would be quite difficult to read. But in such cases it is often clearer just to reword the Good vs. Evil Heights, sentence to avoid the ambiguity, as in jenayah bukan "a problem associated with language learning". In cases where the word grouping is quite obvious because the pair of words are so often used together, the hyphen can be omitted even when it would strictly be required to avoid ambiguity. For instance "chocolate chip cookies" is is immoral, unlikely to be misread as "chocolate chip-cookies", despite that being the indeks, literal interpretation, and so the hyphen can usually be omitted from taroc pack "chocolate-chip cookies". In general, you should hyphenate a phrase when that particular sentence would otherwise be ambiguous. In any other case, even a nearby sentence containing the same phrase but e.g. after the noun it modifies, you should leave out the hyphen. I.e., the hyphen is not a property of the phrase, but of how you are using the phrase in the sentence. American vs. Indeks! British English I myself am American by birth, despite lecturing in a British university, and I use American spellings by default (e.g. Theory! "organization", not "organisation"). Indeks! Authors are generally free to use whichever spelling they prefer, although publishers will often change the spellings to make e.g. all the papers in a certain edited volume use the same conventions. Thus please do not hesitate to use whichever one of the (correct) spellings you are more comfortable with, as long as you keep it consistent throughout the Heights Essay, document. Formatting and grammar rules When in doubt about grammar or page format, researchers in psychology and jenayah computer science generally follow the APA style guide; biological fields use similar standards. Unfortunately, you do have to Essay about Borderline Personality Disorder pay for the APA guide, though it is now available in bukan a less-expensive electronic edition. Pay attention to how your document looks Use readable, clear fonts and reasonable margins, following the typical format used for similar documents. If your word processor cannot make the spacing regular between words (e.g. most versions of Microsoft Word), turn off right justification. Poor spacing makes the page look jumbled and seem incoherent, even if the writing is not. Nearly all formal writing should simply be stapled --- anything else looks unprofessional. For instance, using a fancy cover and binding for a short paper or report is distracting and makes it difficult to photocopy the paper; such binding is taroc pack, necessary only for long papers that a staple would have trouble keeping together. At the opposite extreme, it should be obvious that folding one corner is not an indeks, acceptable substitute for a staple. Authors are authors, not writers The people who perform a scientific study are called "authors", never writers, even though the results are presented in in Wuthering a written paper. Scientific authorship includes much more than the actual writing, and some authors may well not have written any word in the paper. Use last names Never refer to the authors by their first names, as if they were your friends. They are not, and even if they were, it would be inappropriate to draw attention to that circumstance. Except in jenayah bukan unusual cases to avoid ambiguity or to discuss specific people (e.g. the original founders of a field of Good vs. Evil Essay, research), first names are not even mentioned in the body of a scientific text; the last names are sufficient. Author names are keys -- spell them properly In academic writing, an indeks, author's last name is like the key in a database lookup -- if the Good vs. Evil in Wuthering Heights Essay, name is misspelled (e.g. Indeks! "Davis" for about Disorder "Davies"), your reader will not be able to locate works by that author in the library or online. Moreover, it is extraordinarily impolite to misspell someone's name when you are discussing them; doing so shows that you have not paid much attention to them or their work. Jenayah Bukan! So you should make a special effort to spell author names correctly, double and about Personality triple checking them against the original source, and ensuring that you spell them the same way each time. Use appropriate pronouns Use appropriate pronouns when referring to jenayah bukan indeks the authors. If there are multiple authors, use "they" or "the authors" or the authors' last names, not "he" or "the author". If there is only one author and Good vs. Evil Heights Essay you can determine the jenayah bukan, gender with great confidence, you may use "he" or "she"; otherwise use "the author" or the author's last name. Referring to other texts Use double quotes around the consequentialism theory, title of an article when you refer to jenayah indeks it in consequentialism theory the text. Italics are reserved for jenayah indeks books or other works of its learning, similar length. Avoid underlining altogether --- underlining is just a way of indicating that handwritten or typewritten text should be typeset in italics, and is thus inappropriate when italics are available (as they are on any modern word processor). Be very precise when discussing an author discussing another author For better or worse, academic writing often devolves into discussions of what one author said about another author. If commenting on such controversies, you should be extremely careful about using ambiguous terms like "his", "the author", etc. Very often your reader will have no idea which of the various authors you are referring to, even though it may be clear to you. When in doubt, use the actual last names instead, even if they might sound repetitive. Avoid footnotes Footnotes should be used quite sparingly, and should never be used as a way to bukan avoid the hard work of making your text flow into a coherent narrative. Only when something genuinely cannot be made to fit into Borderline the main flow of the text, yet is somehow still so important that it must be mentioned, does it go into bukan indeks a footnote. Avoid direct quotes In scientific (as opposed to literary or historical) writing, direct quotes should be used only when the precise wording of the original sentences is important, e.g. if the work is why abortion is immoral don marquis, so groundbreaking that the jenayah, words themselves have driven research in vs. Evil in Wuthering Essay this field. In nearly every other case, paraphrasing is more appropriate, because it lets you formulate the idea in the terms suitable for your particular paper, focusing on jenayah, the underlying issue rather than the way one author expressed it. Be careful with arguments about grammar If you are going to set it off film criticize the grammar or spelling of an author in writing, you should be extraordinarily careful to verify that you are correct. Jenayah Bukan! Reading a long rant from an American about how a person of British upbringing has supposedly misspelled words like "utilisation", or vice versa, can be quite painful. There is accross, no need to mention explicitly reading the paper A lot of students use phrases like "while reading this paper, I . " and jenayah bukan "In this paper the authors . ". Personality Disorder! Try to avoid this redundancy. If you use the word "author" you need not also use "paper", and vice versa. Similarly, it is jenayah indeks, clear that whatever you discovered about the paper, you discovered while reading the paper; we do not need to be reminded of this. Academic writing is always about taroc pack, papers and authors, and thus those topics should only jenayah be discussed when they are relevant. Discussing existing work Whenever you bring up an existing piece of research, whether it is your own or someone else's, there is a standard way of doing it properly. Theory! First you say what the research showed, then you say what its limitations are, and then you say how your own work is going to overcome those limitations. I.e., say what has been done, what has not been done, and how you are going to do some of jenayah indeks, what has not been done. If you are doing a literature review rather than an original research paper, you just describe what you think should be done, rather than what you plan to do. Unless you want to Borderline Disorder make an enemy, you should always mention something positive about existing work before exploring the jenayah bukan indeks, limitations, and you should always assume that the theory, person you are discussing will read what you wrote. Of course, sometimes there is jenayah bukan, a good reason to why abortion don marquis make an enemy, e.g. to bukan draw attention to yourself by attacking someone famous, but you should be sure to choose your enemies wisely. Discussing proposed work In a research proposal, it is never acceptable to announce only that you are planning to "study topic X". In the accross its learning, context of research, studying is a vague and unbounded task, with no criterion for bukan success and set it off film no way to tell if you are getting anywhere. Studying is something you do in a course, where someone can tell you what to focus on jenayah bukan indeks, and can test you to Essay about Borderline Personality Disorder see if you got the right answer; research is not like that. In research, you need to jenayah bukan indeks spell out the specific questions you are going to try to answer, the specific phenomena that need explanations, and its learning so on bukan, -- it's up to you to define the question and the methods, and until you've done so, it's not research, just idle speculation. Discussion/future work In the theory, discussion sections of a research paper, be sure to discuss all topics that the audience expected to see in the paper, even if you yourself do not believe them to be relevant. The reader is more likely to assume that you have been sloppy about your literature review than to assume you knew about the work but believed it not to jenayah be relevant. Page restrictions can help here --- they provide a good excuse for omitting topics that you do not believe to be relevant. In a longer article or thesis without page limits you have no choice but to address the issue and explicitly state why the topic is its learning, not relevant despite the jenayah indeks, common belief that it is. Bibliographies Students often seem to think that bibliographies are mysterious, tricky things with rules far too complex to understand or remember. Essay! Although there is a vast array of different bibliographic formats, the underlying principles are actually not complicated at bukan, all. Simply put, all bibliographies must have a certain basic minimum standard of information in order to fulfill their function of allowing people to locate the specific item of reference material you cite. In particular, every bibliography entry needs an author, date, and title, every journal article absolutely must have a volume and page numbers, and consequentialism theory every conference paper must have the title of the conference proceedings, the page numbers, and some indication of who published it. Without having every bit of this basic information, there is no way to be sure that readers can find the one specific article that you are discussing. Conversely, you should not include anything not necessary or useful for locating the jenayah indeks, article, such as the cost of reprints. As long as the accross, correct information is bukan, included, there are many acceptable bibliography formats, though note that in set it off film all cases each entry ends in a period. Citations The bibliography or reference list in an academic paper must consist of precisely those sources that you cite in the text, without any extra sources and without omitting any. Bukan Indeks! Each citation must provide enough information for its learning the reader to find the correct source in the bibliography; beyond that, any number of bukan, citation formats will do unless there is some specific standard you are told to follow. Why Abortion Don Marquis! One common approach is to use author-date citations like "(Smith, Wu, and jenayah bukan Tong 2008)", but other approaches such as numbering the bibliography entries and then using bracketed or superscript numbers are also fine. If using numeric citations with brackets, note that there must always be a space before the first bracket, as in ". Set It Off Film! known ", ( not ". known"). If using author-date citations, you must remember that any item in parentheses does not exist , as far as the grammar of the jenayah indeks, sentence is is immoral don marquis, concerned, and thus it cannot be used as part of the indeks, sentence. Thus the rule is vs. Evil, simply to jenayah bukan indeks put the set it off film, parentheses around the part that would be acceptable to omit when reading aloud, as in "Carlin (1972) showed that. Bukan Indeks! " or ". as seen in rats (Carlin 1972)." ( not "(Carlin 1972) showed that. " and its learning not ". as seen in rats Carlin (1972)."). It is usually best to have only a single level of parentheses, because multiple parentheses start to distract from the main text. Thus I would prefer "has been established (but for a counterexample see Johnson, 1905)" to "has been established (but for a counterexample see Johnson (1905))". "I" and jenayah "we" Writing standards disagree about whether to why abortion is immoral use "I" and "we" (and their various forms) in academic work. Some argue that those personal pronouns distract from what should be objective and scientifically valid without recourse to any particular speaker, or even that they just do not sound "scientific". Others argue that omitting "I" and jenayah bukan "we" results in awkward, passive sentences rather than direct "We did X" sentences. Personally, I believe that academic writing should use personal pronouns whenever what is being reported was an arbitrary and specific choice made by a human being, or for why abortion don marquis opinions or personal judgment, precisely because these pronouns emphasize that a human was involved in the work. When reporting universal scientific facts or observations, I would not use personal pronouns, because any reasonable observer would have reported similar results and thus there is bukan, no need to emphasize the role of the authors. Thus, personally, I believe that "I" and "we" have their place in academic writing, i.e., to emphasize the human element where appropriate; in other circumstances I would discourage their use. Please note that I happen to disagree with a few of the rules commonly accepted for English text, and in the text on this page I happily use my own rules instead. Taroc Pack! You might wish to follow the accepted usage in bukan indeks such cases, though I would much rather everyone used my own much better rules as listed below. If you do agree to join my one-man campaign to fix the English language, I cannot accept any responsibility for points deducted by vs. Evil in Wuthering Heights, less enlightened folks. :-) Punctuation after quotations In American English (and in jenayah bukan indeks some cases for taroc pack British English), punctuation following a bit of jenayah indeks, quoted text is traditionally placed inside the consequentialism, quotation. However, I consider that rule an egregious violation of the whole notion of jenayah indeks, quotation, i.e. an obvious bug in taroc pack the English language. For example, if I am quoting someone who said that "life is hard", I always put the comma outside the quotation mark because they themselves did not necessarily have a pause when they said it; in fact, they probably had a full stop (which would be written as a period). Bukan! Accepted American usage is to write "life is hard," but the computer programmer in me just cannot be convinced to make such an obvious semantic error. Spaces around dashes An em-dash is a long dash, longer than an en-dash and Good vs. Evil Essay a hyphen. The traditional formatting for an em-dash does not use any spaces, as in indeks "life is set it off film, hard---then you die". Jenayah Bukan! However, I myself much prefer to put a space before and after the set it off film, dash. Without the spaces the jenayah indeks, dash appears to be connecting two words like "hard---then", which makes no grammatical sense. Grammatically, the function of the dash is to separate and connect phrases or clauses, not words, and vs. Evil Heights Essay I prefer to make that visually clear by putting spaces around the dash. Again, in my opinion the accepted usage is a bug in the language. Dangling prepositions Officially, it is an error to end a sentence with a preposition, as in "they arrived at the place they were heading to". However, in practice it is often very difficult and awkward to reword sentences to avoid dangling prepositions. Thus I consider this rule to be optional at best. Serial commas In Britain and indeks some other less-enlightened countries, the set it off film, comma is often omitted before an 'and' in a list. For instance, they will write of "ham, chips and eggs", rather than "ham, chips, and eggs". I consider this an appalling, confusing construction, because it meaninglessly groups the last two items in the list together. Lists are generally meant to bukan be collections of equals, so there should be just as many separators between "chips" and "eggs" as between "ham" and "chips". In many cases, omitting the serial comma is ambiguous. Moreover, in the very rare case where adding the comma is ambiguous, the vs. Evil in Wuthering Heights Essay, sentence should be rewritten anyway. Oxford University Press, at jenayah bukan, least, agrees with me; see the Wikipedia serial comma entry. Again, this insistence on why abortion is immoral, using appropriate syntax is probably driven by the computer programmer in me, but I think all right-thinking people should be offended whenever a serial comma is omitted. Commas after "i.e." and jenayah indeks "e.g." Many grammar books state that a comma is always required after "i.e." and "e.g." used in a sentence, as in taroc pack "sentences often contain spelling errors, i.e., words spelled incorrectly". The inspiration for this rule is that such abbreviations should be mentally expanded to the English translation of the indeks, Latin phrase for which they stand ("i.e." translating to "that is", and "e.g." translating to taroc pack "for example", which in itself is an important distinction to jenayah know). Taroc Pack! However, these terms come up very often in formal writing, and in many cases I consider it inappropriate to add symbolic pauses (i.e. Bukan! commas) around them. Such pauses break up the flow of the sentence, and modern readers treat the abbreviations just as they would any other word, without internally translating them to Heights Latin phrases and then English phrases. Thus in many cases I prefer to omit the comma after the abbreviation, and sometimes also the one before it. Some people, even more pedantic than I, disagree. This document is in the public domain. Jenayah Indeks! You are free to copy it, redistribute it, modify it, or use it for any other non-fraudulent purpose. If redistributing a complete copy or a lengthy excerpt, please (1) retain this notice, (2) clearly mark the is immoral, original author, and jenayah bukan (3) clearly mark any changes that you make as your own and not those of the original author.
Buy Essay Online -
Indeks jenayah berdasarkan KPI Interpol - Semasa - Sinar Harian
Nov 11, 2017 Jenayah bukan indeks, write my essay for me with professional academic writers -
Gerbang Sejarah PA Cikgu Chua: Jenayah Bukan Indeks: EseiSmartWritingService is an accomplished, multifunctional and bukan indeks, credible online custom writing company, aimed at supplying expert writing help for all students worldwide. Our custom writing services focus on producing the best results for consequentialism students through enhancing their essay writing skills in order to achieve faster educational process. Undoubtedly, every student studying at the high school, college or university level complains about the number of complicated assignments of various types that consume too much time, exacerbate nerves and overwhelm their best efforts. Our service is always ready to facilitate everyone’s educational process by offering its reliable writing assistance with all kinds of written assignments. We make it possible for indeks every student to order exactly the type of academic paper that each student needs to set it off film, save time, develop skills, and jenayah indeks, make the grade. Professional Team of Talented Writers. Some students are not able to set it off film, cope with their homework assignments for various reasons and our job is to prepare these assignments by the required deadline, fill them with up-to-date and genuine content and organize these papers in accordance with the professor’s expectations. Fortunately, we easily complete papers you need them, due to the professional work of bukan indeks our proficient and qualified staff of Good academic writers. We assign students’ orders to jenayah, the most talented PhD and Master’s degree specialists for Good the purpose of achieving the highest quality level. These writers can boast of many years of bukan indeks paper writing experience, profound knowledge of taroc pack their major disciplines and years of pedagogical experience at educational institutions of various types. This practice has been quite useful for our experts, because they have learned about the general standards of writing, the norms of formatting and jenayah bukan, the correct organization of many kinds of written papers. Essay About Personality! If you are looking for a premium custom essay writing service, you will hardly find better essayists anywhere. We do this by working with a team of exceptional freelance experts who can turn any topic into a high quality first-class paper that combines deep research and exceptional insights. If you are having difficulty with a research paper, we want to indeks, help you forget about your academic writing challenges by taking the stress out of the consequentialism theory, writing process. Our writers use their creativity, subject matter expertise, and critical thinking skills in bukan, order to deliver research paper that provide students with the kind of deeply reasoned and carefully researched analyses that turn every one of our unique papers into a powerful learning aid. Of course, students expect to get a well-formatted, compelling and illuminating academic paper when they pay money for professional essay writing service, and we work earnestly to satisfy every customer. When you ask for accross help at SmartWritingService, you may be sure that the paper you receive will meet your specifications and the requirements provided by both you and your professor. When order custom writing online from our powerful service you receive: A paper written from scratch; Access to our helpful support team to handle any problems or questions; 24/7 online assistance; The skills, knowledge, and indeks, expertise of the set it off film, best academic writers available; Guaranteed satisfaction. When you place an indeks, order with us, we select a highly trained writer with subject matter expertise in its learning, your topic. Jenayah! We match your essay to a specialist who can get the paper right. This expert engages in our comprehensive custom writing process, which begins with evaluating the assignment, gathering research, and delivering a high-quality analysis. The writer then completes the prewriting process and begins composition. The writer will format the consequentialism, paper according to your selected style (e.g. Jenayah! MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard, etc.) and why abortion don marquis, will deliver a paper that meets all of the requirements of your order. Finally, after writing is complete, a trained editor reviews the writer’s work to proofread and edit the text, check it for originality, and verify it is jenayah bukan indeks, free from plagiarism with the help of computerized detection systems. Always Free from Plagiarism. Every Time. SmartWritingService.com prides itself on producing original papers. We double-check every custom-written paper to ensure it is completely free from plagiarism. We take this very seriously and actually require our writers to guarantee that they will never engage in Essay about Disorder, academic dishonesty or copy and paste text into your paper because we know that students must meet this standard themselves. You know that your professor would never allow you to earn credit for bukan a plagiarized term paper or homework assignment, and that is why we ensure that the model papers we produce meet the same standard of 100% original writing every time. We also encourage our writers and clients to work together to discuss approaches to the essay topic to ensure that your instructions and smart ideas make their way into the paper so that it truly reflects your approach and your needs. We know that many students have great ideas that can blossom when a professional writing company shows them the consequentialism, best way to take those ideas and write a great paper based on them. We Are Always Available, Whenever You Need Us. If you’re like many students, you’ve probably tried writing a paper right before it is indeks, due. Accross! This makes it very difficult to complete a top-quality paper successfully. Our writing service exists specifically to help students who are running out of time but still need exceptional essay help on the tightest of deadlines. We can provide you with high quality writing help, and we can deliver on jenayah indeks your schedule. Contact us to learn how we can aid with term papers, essays, case studies, thesis papers and Good Heights Essay, complex dissertations and jenayah bukan indeks, how our assistance is made possible with the help of taroc pack our affordable pricing and indeks, timely delivery. Set It Off Film! We are available around the clock, and our customer care representatives are standing by to answer your questions, evaluate your essay needs, and match you with a writer who can help you achieve your essay goals. Contact us to discuss how we can help! Using our established writing service, you get a non-plagiarized well-written paper, organized according to the standards of your educational institution, profound research on the topic, sound ideas and, consequently, much more leisure time at a reasonable cost. Calculate the price of bukan indeks your order. 100% Moneyback Guarantee Plagiarism Free Guarantee Free revisions according to our Revision Policy Free title page Free bibliography & reference Free formatting (APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard and others) 24/7 Customer Support. I know absolutely nothing about set it off film this topic. So, the writer helped me with this issue more than I could even imagine. Great writers work in your service ;) Topic title: Indian Railway Dilemma. Discipline: Business Studies. I would highly recommend this writer. The paper is jenayah bukan indeks, very thorough, relevant, and complete. Very pleased with my author.
Essay Writer for All Kinds of Papers -
Menjadi belia cemerlang: belia adalah aset negara yang perlu digilap
Nov 11, 2017 Jenayah bukan indeks, order content from the best essay writing service -